Conway Stoughton LLC - Attorneys at Law in West Hartford, CT
· Verdicts/Settlements
· Transactions
· Representative Clients
· Experience
· Honors/Awards
· Special licenses/certifications
· Position within the law firm
· Bar and/or professional activity
· Pro Bono and community service
· Scholarly lectures/writings
· Education/employment background
· Other outstanding achievements
Details on the Connecticut Super Lawyer selection process can be found at https://www.superlawyers.com/connecticut/selection_details.html.
*indicators are not treated equally; some have a high maximum point value than others
At trial, Attorney Adams, joined by Attorney Chris Williams, argued that the insured’s claim had been adjusted pursuant to the operative insurance policy’s terms and that, even if the insured had colorable grounds upon which to supplement or expand the scope of coverage, it had failed to meet its policy obligations to advance such claims. The Court ultimately agreed with the insurer’s defense and, in rendering judgment in the insurer’s favor, held the insured to its obligations under the policy. Conway Stoughton LLC is particularly proud of this outcome as the current judicial environment heavily favors finding coverage for insureds no matter the policy terms – a tide Attorney Adams was able to stem through her advocacy.
In Connecticut the owners and keepers of animals are strictly liable for any damage caused by those animals per Connecticut General Statute § 22-357. Despite this rigorous standard, Attorneys Dwyer and Williams were able to argue that the plaintiff, in breaking up a fight between two dogs, was acting in such a way that “would naturally antagonize the dog and cause it to attack.” Although this is an exception to the strict liability imposed by statute, it has never been applied in this factual context. Our litigation attorneys were able to successfully defeat the plaintiff’s liability claims. Despite the defense making a reasonable offer during mediation in response to a $300,000 demand, the offer was not accepted by the plaintiff. The jury ultimately ruled for the defense. The plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict was denied and the case is being appealed.